I was driving the other day and saw a bumper sticker that caught my attention. Usually I am like everyone else, and I read them, perhaps get a chuckle, and don’t give them a second thought. This one was good enough that I took a picture of it when we came to the stop light, just because I thought it worth remembering. The bumper sticker was green with white letters, and only two words long. It said simply “Eschew Obfuscation”.
Alas, I love the irony.
This had me chuckling all the way to work, where I thought that I might share this bit of humor with some of my co-workers. The chuckling soon stopped as I shared this and was met, more often than not, with blank stares of decided incomprehension. How sad is it that we no longer use language to its fullest? Is the art of a well-turned phrase simply something of the past? Am I expecting too much from people? I think that it is the result of something far more sinister. I think I am witnessing in microcosm the effects of dumbing-down society. Of the people I told, only about one in twenty got it. And I believe that half of those were just laughing at the right spot by chance.
Now, I am not advocating obfuscation by engaging overlong or complicated words for their own sake, far from it. But I am reminded of a person trying to correct me when I used the word ‘inane’ to describe a task I was doing. I was informed that the word was ‘insane’ and I should know what I mean before I start talking. Excuse me? Inane is a word:
in•ane ɪˈneɪn - Show Spelled Pronunciation[i-neyn]
–adjective
1. lacking sense, significance, or ideas; silly: inane questions.
2. empty; void. –noun
3. something that is empty or void, esp. the void of infinite space.
[Origin: 1655–65; < L inānis ] —Related forms in•ane•ly, adverb
inane. (n.d.). Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1). Retrieved November 11, 2007, from Dictionary.com website: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/inane
Gee, next we’ll have to make people resign because of the language they use – oh, wait. That happened in D.C. already, didn’t it? I think that it is pathetic that the use of our language has diminished to such a point that people actually have to resign because others are too limited in their vocabulary, and take offense. For those that don’t remember, I am referring to staff member David Howard’s resignation over the use of the word ‘niggardly’ in a staff meeting. (http://www.adversity.net/special/niggardly.htm for more info). Had to be let go by D.C. Mayor Anthony Williams. Sorry, I guess we can’t have a staffer that uses the big words. Especially those that bear similarity to a racist word. Let’s just look that one up, shall we?
nig•gard•ly ˈnɪg ərd li - Show Spelled Pronunciation[nig-erd-lee]
–adjective
1. reluctant to give or spend; stingy; miserly.
2. meanly or ungenerously small or scanty: a niggardly tip to a waiter.
niggardly. (n.d.). Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1). Retrieved November 11, 2007, from Dictionary.com website: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/niggardly
Oh, I must have missed the racial connotation somewhere. How silly of me, to actually check the definition of words; especially words I am unsure of. Much easier to have someone lose their job than admit I don’t know the meaning of a word and took it wrong. Language is the art of expressing ones ideas to others so that meaning can be conveyed. Having a larger vocabulary makes one more clear, although some obfuscate through verbosity. The more words you know, the better the idea and meanings can be conveyed. Just make sure they don’t sound racist.
Please, comment back, but use small words –